Module 02: Identifying Customers, Segmentation and Targeting
Module 2
Module Overview
Module 01 ended with a puzzle: Coca-Cola and Pepsi offered the same functional, social and experiential value, and one grew while the other shrank. The difference was the customer. Module 02 is the machinery for finding that customer.
The module works in two directions. It starts inductively, by reading three Coca-Cola advertisements backwards to recover the target group each was built for, and only then builds the theory: Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning, the five bases of segmentation, the conditions a segment must satisfy to be worth serving, and the five targeting strategies.
Memory hook: Segmentation is dividing. Targeting is choosing. Differentiation is distinguishing. Positioning is communicating. Note that the first three happen inside your office and the customer never sees them. Only positioning reaches the customer.
2.1 Identifying the Target Market from Advertising
Three Coca-Cola India advertisements are analysed in sequence. The pedagogic reason there are three, and not one, only becomes clear at the end: the value proposition stays constant while geography, demography, psychography and behaviour all shift.
2.1.1 Coke Ad I: The Punjab Sugarcane Field
The ad is set in rural North India, Punjab, in hot weather. An urban traveller and a rural sugarcane farmer meet.
| Base | What the ad signals |
|---|---|
| Geographic | North India, Punjab. Rural versus urban. Hot climate |
| Demographic | Young. Students or people in early jobs, and farmers. Girls and a male sugarcane farmer, so gender is in play. Socio-economic classification by income: upper, middle and lower class, that is SEC A, B and below |
| Psychographic | Extroverted, modern, energetic |
| Behavioural | Travellers, loyal users, current users of the product |
Common trap: Socio-economic classification (SEC A, B, C) is a demographic variable, not a psychographic one. It is income and occupation based, which makes it measurable, which is exactly what psychographics are not.
Value delivered: refreshment and thirst-quenching (functional), the shared moment between two strangers (social), the pleasure of the cold drink on a hot day (experiential), and affordability at a rural price point (economic).
2.1.2 Discussion Response: Which Base Did Ad I Lean On?
Based on the segmentation categories discussed in the video, which segmentation base do you think Coca-Cola focused on the most in the first ad? How did the elements of the ad support your interpretation?
According to my analysis of the first ad, Coca-Cola focused on the demographic, geographic and to some extent psychographic segmentation bases.
First, the setting of the ad in a rural area shows Coca-Cola's focus on the geographic base. This effectively communicated Coca-Cola's availability to viewers, which is essential in marketing as it is one of the 4 Ps, Place.
Secondly, the ad demonstrates Coca-Cola's demographic segmentation by contrasting the urban traveller with the rural farmer, showing the brand's appeal across different socio-economic classes.
Lastly, the ad highlights Coca-Cola's ability to quench thirst on a hot summer day, refresh the consumer and bring happiness. The use of the song "Yaara da Tashan" conveys an energetic, upbeat mood and ties it to a social event. All of this suggests psychographic segmentation, as the brand is attaching the drink to an emotion.
2.1.3 Coke Ad II: The Shop Counter
After watching the video, identify the persona you think the company is aiming for. How would you segment this audience?
We can segment the audience targeted in this ad on their flamboyant and outgoing persona as depicted. This target group is also social and generally extroverted. If Coca-Cola can win customers of this specific target group, they are sure to have a loyal customer base, as such people will always prefer a Coke for refreshment.
So this audience can be segmented on demographics and psychographics.
| Base | Profile |
|---|---|
| Demographics | Age 18 to 35, Western India, lower to middle class |
| Psychographics | Interested in popular culture, brands and social trends. Confident, outgoing, aspirational |
We can also see that the ad targets the shopkeepers, to build the B2B network. It brings awareness to shopkeepers who did not know Coca-Cola, and shows how Coca-Cola can provide them with monetary gain and a satisfied customer base.
Note: This B2B reading was reached independently before the lecture supplied it. It is the correct reading. A consumer ad that also recruits the retailer is doing two jobs at once, and the retailer is a collaborator in 5 C terms.
2.1.4 Coke Ad III: The Mountain Guide
Who do you think the ad is made for? What kind of people or groups are they aiming to connect with?
The ad targets a young age group who are social, extroverted and adventure-seeking. The ad being set in a mountainous rural area shows the availability of Coca-Cola, and the local guide knowing what Coca-Cola is shows the loyal customer base Coca-Cola wants to gather. This loyalty is also shown when the couple reaches for a Coke when they need a "thanda", and when the local guide is dissatisfied on being handed a different drink after asking for a "thanda".
The lecture's own reading of the same ad:
| Base | Ad III |
|---|---|
| Geographic | Mountains, a colder area, possibly the Northeast. Remote terrain |
| Demographic | Two target groups: a honeymooning husband and wife couple, and a local mountain guide, a professional. Still youth, but slightly older, in their twenties |
| Psychographic | A loving couple, extroverts, adventure seekers |
| Behavioural | Travelling, carrying the bottle with them, loyal, high users. The guide refuses any brand other than Coca-Cola |
| Strategy | Availability and communication: people are aware of the brand even in a remote mountainous location, and it is there when they want it |
"Thanda matlab Coca-Cola"
In India, Coca-Cola and other soft drinks are extremely popular, especially during the hot summer months, when roughly 70 to 80 percent of all aerated soft drink consumption happens. People use the word "thanda", which means "cold", to ask for a refreshing drink rather than naming a brand. Because Coca-Cola is so well known and associated with being cold, many consumers simply say "thanda" when they want a Coke.
The mechanism is a two-sided understanding. If both the consumer and the retailer accept that thanda means Coca-Cola, then every time a customer asks for a thanda the retailer hands over a Coke, and every time the retailer hands over a Coke the customer is satisfied, because thanda is Coca-Cola. It converts a generic category word into brand property, which is why the campaign ran.
2.1.5 The Cross-Ad Conclusion
This is the reason three ads are shown rather than one, and it is the analytical payoff of the whole block.
| Ad I | Ad II | Ad III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geography | Rural Punjab, hot plains | Urban and semi-urban Western India, a shop counter | Mountains, cold terrain, remote |
| Demography | Students, early-job youth, farmers, SEC A to C | Age 18 to 35, lower to middle class, plus shopkeepers as a B2B audience | Honeymooning couple plus a professional mountain guide, twenties |
| Psychography | Extrovert, modern | Flamboyant, aspirational, trend-aware | Loving, extrovert, adventure-seeking |
| Behaviour | Travellers, current users | Occasion buyers, potential loyals | Loyal, high usage, brand refusers |
| Value delivered | Refreshment, social, experiential | Refreshment, social, experiential | Refreshment, social, experiential |
Memory hook, the punchline: The value does not change. Everything else does. Geography changes, demography changes, psychography changes, behaviour changes, but functional, social and experiential value stay exactly the same in all three ads. That is what makes Coca-Cola one proposition served to many segments, and it is a direct continuation of the Module 01 case conclusion.
2.2 Market Segmentation
2.2.1 Understanding STP: Segmentation
Segmentation is the process of segmenting consumers on some parameters called bases, dividing the market into various homogeneous groups.
Common trap: "It is the customers that are segmented, not the product." Every year students segment the product line instead of the population. Sunsilk's several shampoo variants are not the segmentation; they are the response to a segmentation of shampoo buyers by hair need.
2.2.2 Understanding STP: Targeting
Targeting is the process of choosing one or more specific segments to focus on, rather than the whole market.
2.2.3 Understanding STP: Differentiation and Positioning
The perceptual map plots the competition's offerings so you can find an unoccupied position. Say the green dot is the position we want to acquire.
Differentiation is the process of identifying that position and distinguishing your offering from competitors. It can rest on price, quality, promotion, durability, service facility, guarantee or warranty, the spokesperson, or anything else.
Positioning is creating the right perception in the mind of the customer, using the 4 Ps or 7 Ps.
Common trap: Segmentation, targeting and differentiation all happen to the target market and to consumers, not to the product, and the consumer never sees any of it. You have run the survey, cut the segments and designed the differentiation, and the consumer knows nothing. Positioning is the only step that reaches the consumer's mind, and unless it succeeds, the other three were wasted.
What actually goes on behind an ad campaign:
- Collect data from the market through surveys and marketing research.
- Perform statistical analysis to divide consumers into groups.
- Use algorithms and models to identify the target market.
- Identify competitors and compare their offerings with yours.
- Develop the differentiation strategy from that comparison.
- Plan how to communicate that differentiation to the target market.
You watch the result for ninety seconds. All six steps sit behind it.
2.2.4 Worked Example: Segmenting a 100,000-Person Market
The professor's board work. Take one geographic area containing 100,000 people and cut it on four bases: age, income, occupation and personality.
| Segment | Age | Income per month | Occupation | Personality | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 to 30 | 25,000 | IT | Extrovert | 10,000 |
| 2 | 22 to 30 | 50,000 | Bank | Introvert | 25,000 |
| 3 | 31 to 45 | 100,000 | Government | Introvert | 30,000 |
| 4 | 31 to 45 | 200,000 | Consulting | Extrovert | 10,000 |
| 5 | Over 50 | 500,000 | Entrepreneurs | Extrovert | 25,000 |
The segments are exhaustive and mutually exclusive, which is what a valid segmentation must be.
Now the targeting decision. Two different products, two different answers:
| Product | Target segment | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Luxury watch | Segment 5 | Maximum spending power at 500,000 per month, and more mature, so likely to want the image an expensive watch confers |
| Health drink | Segments 1 and 2 | The youngest cohorts, the most health conscious and the most likely to be fitness focused |
Memory hook: The same market yields different targets for different products. The segmentation is a property of the population; the targeting is a property of your offering.
Once segment 3 is chosen (30,000 people, the largest), the perceptual map comes in. Suppose buyers evaluate the category on two parameters, price and quality, each at high, medium and low. Existing players occupy five positions on that map. You pick an unoccupied one, say relatively high price with good quality. That gap is your differentiation.
2.2.5 Differentiated and Undifferentiated Marketing
| Differentiated marketing | Undifferentiated marketing | |
|---|---|---|
| Also called | The rifle approach | The shotgun approach, mass marketing |
| Mechanic | Aim, then shoot | Blast, and it will hit somebody |
| Method | Start with segmentation, identify the specific target market, then tailor a positioning strategy and marketing mix to fit that segment | Target the entire market with one offering, no specific segment |
| Typical categories | Shampoo variants, ten varieties of rice, branded basmati | Rice, dal, pulses, milk, bread, eggs sold generically |
The Ford Model T anchor case. Ford Motors produced the first mass motorised vehicle at a time when long-distance transport meant horses, bulls or donkeys. The Model T (1910 and 1925 models) came with the classic line:
"Any customer can have a car painted in any colour that he wants, so long as it is black."
One car, one colour, take it or leave it. That is the textbook case of undifferentiated mass marketing.
Common trap, and the professor raises it himself: the Model T was expensive, and only the rich or the new-product enthusiast could actually buy one. In that sense it was not truly reaching the mass at all, and it was close to a monopoly. It counts as mass marketing by the classic definition, because the whole market was offered a single product, not because everybody bought one.
The direction of travel is towards differentiation. Even rice divides into rice for pulao, rice for biryani, rice for kheer and rice for cakes, and then into Daawat and India Gate basmati.
2.2.6 Niche Marketing
Niche marketing is having a specific product for a specific segment. Its defining features:
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Market size | Typically small |
| Product | Customised, not standardised. The product is specific to the type of target customer |
| Price | Higher, because you are customising, the market is small, and you are providing higher service |
Examples from the lecture: a supplier providing the full suit, trousers, tie and shirt in a required colour specifically for executives of a particular company; healthcare facilities designed for people who are both diabetic and obese; specialist makeup and personal grooming for film celebrities.
Common trap: Niche marketing is not "a standard product sold to a small group". The whole point is that you do change the product to fit the target customer's need, and that customisation is what justifies the price premium.
So there are three initial approaches: differentiated marketing, mass (undifferentiated) marketing, and niche marketing.
2.2.7 Bases of Segmentation
| Base | What it identifies | Question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic | Where the customer is | Where? |
| Demographic | Measurable vital statistics of the customer | Who? |
| Psychographic | Personality and lifestyle | Why? |
| Behavioural | How the customer behaves towards the product | How do they buy? |
| Technographic | Attitude to technology and online behaviour | How do they buy online? |
Memory hook: The bases are never used alone. Every customer simultaneously has a geography, a demography, a psychography and a behaviour. Real segmentation uses cascading or multi-variable combinations: geodemographic, demopsychographic, geopsychographic, psychobehavioural. They are taught separately only for clarity.
2.2.8 Geographic Segmentation
Geographic parameters: region, city, population density, climate, urban versus rural, terrain.
2.2.9 Demographic Segmentation
Demography is the vital and measurable statistics about a human population. Seven sub-variables are taught:
| # | Variable |
|---|---|
| 1 | Age |
| 2 | Sex / gender |
| 3 | Marital status |
| 4 | Education |
| 5 | Occupation |
| 6 | Income |
| 7 | Family size |
Geography and demography are the most widely used segmentation variables, because every customer demonstrably has both and both are measurable.
But they are not sufficient, and here is why. Suppose a 25 to 30 year old and a 55 to 60 year old both buy Levi's jeans. You have correctly identified two segments, and you still have no idea what strategy to run, because one is in her late twenties and the other in her late fifties and demography alone tells you nothing about why either bought. That gap is what psychographics fills.
2.2.10 Psychographic Segmentation
Where demography explains the who, psychography explains the why. Psychography is the science of using psychology together with demography.
| Constituent | Definition |
|---|---|
| Personality | The way you interact with your environment, how a person responds to stimuli. Somebody taps you on the shoulder: do you read it as friendly, violent or threatening? |
| Lifestyle | The manifestation of your personality. How you live, what you actually do |
2.2.11 The VALS Framework
VALS stands for Values And Lifestyles. It is the most popular commercially available classification scheme based on psychographic measurement, owned by Strategic Business Insights (SBI), a US company. SBI classifies US adults into eight primary groups.
The grid has two dimensions:
- Horizontal: primary motivation, in three columns, Ideals, Achievement, Self-expression
- Vertical: resources and innovation, running from high resources and high innovation at the top to low resources and low innovation at the bottom
| Position | Type | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Top, above all three columns | Innovators | Successful, sophisticated, active, take-charge people with high self-esteem. Highest resources and innovation |
| Ideals, upper | Thinkers | Mature, satisfied and reflective, motivated by ideals, value order, knowledge and responsibility. Look for durability, functionality and value in products |
| Ideals, lower | Believers | Conservative, conventional, motivated by ideals but with fewer resources. Loyal to established brands |
| Achievement, upper | Achievers | Goal oriented, career and family focused, motivated by achievement, with high resources |
| Achievement, lower | Strivers | Trendy and fun-loving but resource constrained. They favour stylish products that emulate the purchases of those with greater material wealth. Cannot buy a luxury brand but will buy something resembling one, or factory seconds, or fakes |
| Self-expression, upper | Experiencers | Young, enthusiastic, impulsive, motivated by self-expression, with high resources |
| Self-expression, lower | Makers | Practical, self-sufficient, motivated by self-expression but with low resources. Build and fix things themselves |
| Bottom, below all three columns | Survivors | Lowest resources and innovation, focused on meeting immediate needs, cautious and brand loyal out of necessity |
Memory hook: Innovators on top, Survivors at the bottom, and six in between in three motivation columns. The upper row of each column has the resources and the lower row does not. Strivers are the exam favourite, because they show how a segment definition converts straight into a product decision: build something in the lower price range that still looks and feels aspirational.
The point of VALS is combination. Layer demography on top: innovators are aged 40 to 45, thinkers 50 to 55, then add where each lives, their income profile, their family size and number of children. Only with geography, demography and psychography together can you actually identify the customer in detail.
2.2.12 The A.I.O. Inventory
The academic literature on personality and lifestyle is extensive, but usually impossible to implement commercially. Researchers, doctors and psychiatrists can classify people psychographically; a marketer cannot. The practical tool is the A.I.O. inventory.
| Letter | Stands for | What it probes |
|---|---|---|
| A | Activities | How consumers spend their time. What do you do at the weekend? On weekdays? In the evening? What health regime do you keep, if any? |
| I | Interests | Preferences and priorities: home, fashion, food, dressing |
| O | Opinions | How the customer feels about a wide variety of events and issues: political, social, environmental, the future |
How it is administered: a battery of statements and questions, to which respondents agree or disagree. From that response set you build the inventory and segment the market. Statistical work then reduces the battery to segments, which is beyond the scope of this course.
Memory hook: A.I.O. is the measurement instrument for psychographics. VALS is a ready-made output you can buy. AIO measures personality and lifestyle; psychographics is personality plus lifestyle; VALS is one commercial classification of the result.
2.2.13 Behavioural Segmentation
Behavioural segmentation looks at the behaviour of current customers. The questions it answers are how to grow the base: can the same customer buy more, or buy more often; can we attract the less committed customers towards the brand; can we raise satisfaction.
Seven behavioural variables:
| Variable | What it segments on |
|---|---|
| Occasion of purchase | When the product is bought or used: daily, festival, gift, emergency |
| Benefits sought | What the buyer is actually buying. People do not buy locks, they buy security. People do not buy beauty products, they buy self-confidence |
| User status | Non-user, ex-user, potential user, first-time user, regular user |
| Usage rate | Light, medium, heavy user |
| Buyer readiness stage | Unaware, aware, informed, interested, desirous, intending to buy |
| Loyalty status | Hardcore loyals, split loyals, shifting loyals, switchers |
| Attitude | Enthusiastic, positive, indifferent, negative, hostile towards the product |
The loyalty ladder is a strategy, not just a label. As a marketer you want to move people up it:
Switcher → Shifting loyal → Split loyal → Hardcore loyal
Common trap: the variable is loyalty status, and the four rungs describe how consistently a buyer sticks with one brand. A split loyal buys two or three brands consistently; a shifting loyal drifts from one brand to another over time; a switcher has no loyalty at all.
2.2.14 Technographic Segmentation
Technographics segments consumers exactly as psychographics or demographics do, except that it is custom made for the internet economy: for technology products, and for technology-savvy consumers. It looks specifically at how consumers behave online, and in particular at their online shopping behaviour.
The base rests on a single, very large divide: attitude towards technology.
| Type | Attitude |
|---|---|
| Technographic optimists | They like technology. They like to learn about it. They do not mind trying something new or experimenting |
| Technographic pessimists | Pessimistic about technology, sometimes even fearful. They want to avoid it |
Attribution: technographic segmentation was conceptualised by Mary Modahl in her 1999 book Now or Never: How Companies Must Change Today to Win the Battle for Internet Consumers, written as part of Forrester Research.
The technography by income grid. Technographics is used the way every base is used, combined with another base, here demography, specifically income. That gives four cells and a distinct strategy for each.
| Cell | Technology attitude | Income | Name | What to do with them |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top left | Optimist | High | Early Adopters | The best target segment. They want the technology and can pay for it. Launch here |
| Top right | Pessimist | High | Mainstream-1, high-income pessimists | The segment worth working on. They have the money but are scared of or avoid the technology. Convert them with reassurance and demonstration, and you gain a strong segment |
| Bottom left | Optimist | Low | Mainstream-2, low-income optimists | Comfortable with technology but cannot afford it. Reach them with offers, schemes, EMI and entry pricing |
| Bottom right | Pessimist | Low | Real laggards | Neither willing nor able. You do not really target them |
The worked case: Flipkart. The Flipkart campaigns of a few years ago in which children play the roles of adults are the professor's example of technographic segmentation done well, and he calls it one of the most successful segmentation campaigns we have seen.
The target is Mainstream-1: middle-aged parents who are not short of money but do not trust the technology for online delivery and online purchase, especially for big-ticket items or fashion, where people want to touch and feel the product. The creative device answers exactly that objection. Children behave like adults and say how easy it is, and the implied message is: even kids can do this, so why are the parents not doing it? It attacks the fear, not the price, because for Mainstream-1 the fear is the binding constraint.
Memory hook: Technographics is what you reach for whenever the product is new technology, online, or app based. And the segment to convert is almost never the laggards. It is the rich pessimist.
2.2.15 The Five Conditions for Effective Segmentation
Having a base is not enough. A segment is only worth building a strategy around if it meets all five of these conditions.
| # | Condition | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identifiable and measurable, with distinct needs | You can point at the group, count it, and it wants something different from other groups |
| 2 | Substantial, that is, enough potential customers to be profitable | The segment is sizable. It is not that two people are positive about the product and that constitutes a segment |
| 3 | Customers are willing and able to buy | Demand is real. They have both the money and the willpower to buy the product |
| 4 | Accessible, that is, marketers can communicate effectively with them | There is some route to reach them, whether conventional media (newspapers, magazines, TV, radio) or modern media (the various social platforms) |
| 5 | Stable, that is, the segment does not change too rapidly | If, by the time you have identified the segment and gone to market, the segment has changed, there is no point in targeting it |
The structural test that sits under all five:
Memory hook: Homogeneous within, heterogeneous between.
Suppose one segment is defined as: age 30 to 40, income 1 lakh per month, occupation executives in IT firms, and there are 50,000 such people in the city. Those 50,000 are homogeneous within on all three of those parameters. Other segments in the same city will be non-IT professionals, or earning less than 1 lakh, or outside the 30 to 40 band, so the segments are heterogeneous between. If a segmentation fails either half of that test, the base was the wrong one.
Common trap: an exam question will give you a "segment" of 40 people, or a segment with no media route to it, or a fashion segment that reinvents itself every quarter, and ask whether it is worth targeting. Run all five conditions, and name the one that fails.
2.3 Targeting Markets
2.3.1 What Targeting Is
Targeting is selecting one or more of the identified segments and concentrating on those rather than on the whole market. Marketers run a target market decision analysis over the whole market on the relevant characteristics (age, residence, gender, income and so on) and then choose the target market that matches their own resources and goals.
Three blocks of criteria for selecting a target segment:
| # | Criterion | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Size and growth | Current demand potential and the rate at which it will expand |
| 2 | Structural attractiveness | External analysis of the market, via Porter's five forces |
| 3 | Organisation's objectives and resources | What you are trying to achieve, and the man, machine, material, money and technology you have to achieve it |
2.3.2 Determining Segment Size
Segment size is the current demand potential estimation for the product or service concerned. The method is three steps:
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Take a sample from the geographical area you are focusing on, based on the chosen basis of segmentation |
| 2 | Collect data from the chosen sample on purchase intention, ability to pay and willingness to pay |
| 3 | Extrapolate to the whole population, using survey and statistical analysis |
What this yields is the number of people who have the need, the willingness and the ability to pay. All three must hold. Need without ability to pay is not demand.
Growth rate is the analysis of how that segment grows over time. If the 30 to 40 age group in Bangalore is 1 lakh today, the question is what it is in five years. If it is still 1 lakh, the market is a bad one, because there is no growth. Is it growing at 2 percent, 3 percent, 5 percent or 10 percent? The data sources are demographic data, the government census, and sociological growth-rate data published in research papers, journals and articles.
Worked numerical: sizing and growing a segment
Given: the target cohort in Bangalore, aged 30 to 40, numbers 100,000 people today. A sample survey finds that 18 percent have the purchase intention plus both the willingness and the ability to pay. The cohort is projected to grow at 5 percent per annum for five years.
Current segment size:
Population in five years:
Segment size in five years, holding the qualified proportion constant:
Answer: current demand potential is 18,000 buyers, rising to roughly 22,973 in five years, an increase of about 27.6 percent. Note that the qualifying screen (need plus willingness plus ability) removes 82 percent of the raw population. Sizing a segment off headcount alone would overstate the market by more than five times.
2.3.3 Structural Attractiveness: Porter's Five Forces
Structural attractiveness is the external analysis of the market. The model is Michael Porter's five forces.
| Force | What it measures | Ideal for you | Worked contrast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threat of new entrants | The entry barrier | Low threat, that is, a high entry barrier | Pharma, arms and ammunition, defence, iron and steel, fertilisers are hard to enter (regulation, heavy investment, real estate, manpower, technology). Retail is easy: you can start selling potatoes, onions and old apparel from your garage tomorrow, so the threat is high and the segment less attractive |
| Threat of intense segment rivalry | The exit barrier | Low threat, that is, a low exit barrier | A retailer sells the inventory and walks away. A brand owner with Sunsilk or Colgate, with plants, machines, manpower and a clientele, cannot simply close the shop. Firms that cannot exit keep running unprofitably, which creates overcapacity and makes the segment unattractive |
| Threat of substitute products | Whether your value proposition is unique | Low threat | If you sell tea and the customer sees no significant difference between tea and coffee in the morning, coffee is a substitute. Raise your price or lose availability and the customer simply switches |
| Bargaining power of buyers | Whether customers can dictate terms | Low | In B2B the customers are bulk buyers taking a significant share of your output, so their bargaining power is high and they can literally dictate the business to you. In B2C, an individual buying soap or toothpaste buys too little volume to matter, so power is low. The caveat: in the age of social media, one unhappy individual can go viral, hit the stock price and shrink the customer base, so individual buyer power is no longer negligible |
| Bargaining power of suppliers | Whether input providers can dictate terms | Low | A single aggregator controlling 200 bikes and 200 riders becomes a significant service supplier to Zomato and can dictate remuneration. Someone with a fleet of 500 cabs can dictate terms to Uber. Suppliers include raw material suppliers, service suppliers, logistics partners, and advertising, promotion and digital marketing partners |
Memory hook: The ideal is high entry barrier, low exit barrier, and all five forces low. In the utopian world that segment does not exist. So you mix and match, score the segments on all five, and pick the one with the best overall profile. You will not get everything low.
Common trap: the first two forces are easy to confuse. Threat of new entrants is about getting in. Threat of intense segment rivalry is about getting out.
2.3.4 The Weighted-Average Segment Scoring Model
The three criteria (size and growth, structural attractiveness, objectives and resources) are combined quantitatively, not by judgement alone. Assign a weight to each criterion, score every segment on every criterion, and take the weighted average. The segment with the highest total score is the target.
Worked numerical
Given: weights of 0.40 for size and growth, 0.35 for structural attractiveness and 0.25 for objectives and resources. Two candidate segments score out of 10 as follows.
| Criterion | Weight | Segment A | Segment B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size and growth | 0.40 | 8 | 6 |
| Structural attractiveness | 0.35 | 5 | 8 |
| Objectives and resources | 0.25 | 6 | 7 |
Segment A:
Segment B:
Answer: Segment B wins at 6.95 against 6.45, even though Segment A is the larger and faster growing market. A big segment inside a structurally hostile industry, with five forces working against you, is worth less than a smaller segment you can defend. This is precisely why size is only one of three criteria.
2.3.5 Targeting Strategy: Single Segment Concentration
The worked frame runs throughout: three customer groups (teens, adults, elders) against three product categories (cosmetics, apparels, shoes), giving a three by three grid of nine segments.
Single segment concentration: choose one of the nine. Cosmetics for adult women, and nothing else.
2.3.6 Targeting Strategy: Selective Specialization
Selective specialization: focus on several individual segments that need not be related. Shoes for teens, cosmetics for adult women, apparels for elders. Three of the nine.
2.3.7 Targeting Strategy: Product Specialization
Product specialization: one particular product for everybody. Cosmetics for teens, adults and elders alike.
2.3.8 Targeting Strategy: Market Specialization
Market specialization: satisfy all the needs of one particular customer group. Cosmetics, apparels and shoes, all for adult women.
Common trap: product specialization and market specialization are mirror images and are routinely swapped in exams. Product specialization is one row (one product, all groups). Market specialization is one column (all products, one group).
2.3.9 Targeting Strategy: Differentiated Full Market Coverage
Full market coverage takes all nine segments. It comes in two forms.
Differentiated full market coverage: cover all nine cells, but with different offerings for each. Cosmetics go to teens, adults and elders, but not the same cosmetics: price points differ, promotions differ. Apparels go to all three, but sizes, colours, cuts, materials, promotions and prices all differ.
2.3.10 Targeting Strategy: Undifferentiated Full Market Coverage
Undifferentiated full market coverage: one offering for everybody. This is the mass marketing strategy.
2.3.11 The Five Targeting Strategies, and a Sixth
| # | Strategy | Cells covered on a 3x3 grid | Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Single segment concentration | 1 | All resources on one segment |
| 2 | Selective specialization | Several, unrelated | Spread risk across independent segments |
| 3 | Product specialization | One row | Sell one product to every group |
| 4 | Market specialization | One column | Serve every need of one group |
| 5 | Full market coverage | All 9 | Differentiated (different offering per cell) or undifferentiated (one offering for all) |
The live revision session adds a sixth strategy at the opposite extreme from mass marketing:
| Strategy | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Undifferentiated | Mass marketing, one product for all segments | Coca-Cola's original strategy |
| Differentiated | Different products for different segments | Marriott offering luxury, business and budget hotels |
| Concentrated | Focusing on one or a few niches | Rolex targeting luxury consumers |
| Micromarketing | Tailoring products to local or individual customer segments | Personalised ads served through social media; local menu variation |
Memory hook: the targeting spectrum runs from one offering for everyone (undifferentiated) to one offering for each person (micromarketing). Everything else sits between those poles, and the choice is driven by the weighted score of size, attractiveness and your own resources.
2.3.12 Where This Leads
Segmentation and targeting are complete. The marketer can now define the consumer and predict their probable response to various stimuli. The next step is a positioning strategy, and before positioning you must first establish how your product or service differs from the competitor's. That is differentiation, and it opens Module 03.
Quick Revision Checklist
| Concept | One-line answer |
|---|---|
| STP | Segment (divide), Target (choose), Position (communicate). Differentiation sits between target and position |
| What gets segmented | The customers, never the product |
| Five bases | Geographic, Demographic, Psychographic, Behavioural, Technographic. Never used alone |
| Demographic sub-variables | Age, sex, marital status, education, occupation, income, family size |
| Psychographics | Personality plus lifestyle. Lifestyle is the manifestation of personality |
| VALS | Strategic Business Insights. 8 types on Primary Motivation (Ideals, Achievement, Self-expression) by Resources and Innovation |
| A.I.O. | Activities, Interests, Opinions, measured with an agree/disagree statement battery |
| Behavioural variables | Occasion, benefits, user status, usage rate, buyer readiness, loyalty status, attitude |
| Loyalty ladder | Switcher to shifting loyal to split loyal to hardcore loyal |
| Technographics | Mary Modahl, Forrester, 1999. Optimist versus pessimist, crossed with income |
| Best technographic target | Early Adopters. The one to convert is Mainstream-1, the high-income pessimist |
| Five conditions | Identifiable and measurable, substantial, willing and able to buy, accessible, stable |
| Structural test | Homogeneous within, heterogeneous between |
| Three targeting criteria | Size and growth, structural attractiveness, objectives and resources. Combined by weighted average |
| Five forces | New entrants (entry barrier), segment rivalry (exit barrier), substitutes, buyer power, supplier power |
| Ideal barriers | High entry barrier, low exit barrier |
| Five targeting strategies | Single segment, selective specialization, product specialization, market specialization, full market coverage |
| Sixth strategy | Micromarketing, tailoring to local or individual segments |
| Coke three-ad payoff | Value constant, target group changes |